<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Overseer Network Monitor Weblog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.overseer-network-monitor.com/weblog/rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.overseer-network-monitor.com/weblog</link>
	<description>A weblog by the author of Overseer Network Monitor</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 17:04:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Overseer 4.1.47 has been released</title>
		<link>http://www.overseer-network-monitor.com/weblog/2012/04/10/overseer-4-1-47-has-been-released/</link>
		<comments>http://www.overseer-network-monitor.com/weblog/2012/04/10/overseer-4-1-47-has-been-released/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 17:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dkalweit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[New Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News about Overseer Network Monitor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overseer-network-monitor.com/weblog/?p=367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Overseer 4.1.47 has now been released. This includes a few bug fixes for intermittent problems that a couple users have experienced. I also made a change in the database library that should increase the performance of the database&#8211; which may be most noticeable on slower machines. Lastly, I added a quick usability enhancement to not always auto-expand [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Overseer 4.1.47 has now been released. This includes a few bug fixes for intermittent problems that a couple users have experienced. I also made a change in the database library that should increase the performance of the database&#8211; which may be most noticeable on slower machines. Lastly, I added a quick usability enhancement to not always auto-expand the resource groups on the left&#8211; it now remembers which ones are collapsed when refreshing. This was mostly an annoyance, and is now fixed.</p>
<p>Overseer 4.1 is currently in bug-fix status. Overseer 5.0 is currently under development, and will have many usability enhancements, a bit of a face-lift, MSSQL database support, and some new resource types.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.overseer-network-monitor.com/weblog/2012/04/10/overseer-4-1-47-has-been-released/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Overseer resource dependencies</title>
		<link>http://www.overseer-network-monitor.com/weblog/2012/04/03/overseer-resource-dependencies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.overseer-network-monitor.com/weblog/2012/04/03/overseer-resource-dependencies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 19:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dkalweit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[How To]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips and Tricks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Using the Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overseer-network-monitor.com/weblog/?p=361</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve recently had a couple customers ask me about dependencies. This is a relatively new feature in Overseer, so some of our existing customers don&#8217;t even know exactly how to use them. They are rather hidden, but will become more visible in the next major version of Overseer. While hidden, resource dependencies can be very [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve recently had a couple customers ask me about dependencies. This is a relatively new feature in Overseer, so some of our existing customers don&#8217;t even know exactly how to use them. They are rather hidden, but will become more visible in the next major version of Overseer. While hidden, resource dependencies can be very powerful in controlling excessive notifications when a single point of failure goes down, such as an internet connection.</p>
<p>Overseer lets you specify multiple dependencies, although often times this will just be one&#8211; such as an internet connection or <a title="Ping Monitoring Software" href="http://www.overseer-network-monitor.com/Ping-Monitoring-Software.aspx">pinging a server</a> before attempting to <a title="Monitoring Windows event logs" href="http://www.overseer-network-monitor.com/Event-Log-Monitoring-Software.aspx">monitor Windows event logs</a>, services, disk space, websites, etc.</p>
<p>To setup a dependency, first click the &#8216;Advanced&#8217; button on the resource dialog:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.overseer-network-monitor.com/weblog/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Edit-HTTP-Resource.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-362" title="Edit HTTP Resource" src="http://www.overseer-network-monitor.com/weblog/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Edit-HTTP-Resource.png" alt="" width="410" height="423" /></a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>This will bring up a dialog that lets you add and remove dependencies:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.overseer-network-monitor.com/weblog/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Advanced-Resource-Settings.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-363" title="Advanced Resource Settings" src="http://www.overseer-network-monitor.com/weblog/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Advanced-Resource-Settings.png" alt="" width="400" height="312" /></a></p>
<p>On this screen, click the &#8216;Add&#8217; button to add a dependency or &#8216;Delete&#8217; to delete one. You can also select the &#8220;Send notifications on dependency failures&#8221; setting. When this is checked, Overseer will send a notification to the user when the resource dependency fails. For example, the resource in this example is &#8220;Microsoft&#8217;s Website&#8221;. Overseer will first check the status of the configured &#8216;Local Gateway&#8217; dependent resource, and if it is down, it will normally not check or send notifications for &#8220;Microsoft&#8217;s Website&#8221; being down&#8211; it will simply go to &#8216;Failure&#8217; status silently instead&#8211; ideally so you can get one notification that &#8220;Local Gateway&#8221; is down, instead of dozens that other resources that depend on it are down as well. However, if this checkbox is checked, notifications will be sent about &#8220;Microsoft&#8217;s Website&#8221; being down when Overseer determines that the &#8220;Local Gateway&#8221; dependent resource is down.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>When clicking &#8216;Add&#8217; on the resource dependencies screen, you&#8217;re presented with this dialog:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.overseer-network-monitor.com/weblog/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Select-Resource.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-364" title="Select Resource" src="http://www.overseer-network-monitor.com/weblog/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Select-Resource.png" alt="" width="431" height="370" /></a></p>
<p>This dialog lets you find a resource more easily by filtering&#8211; by name, type, and resource group. Once you find the one you&#8217;d like, simply double-click it, or select it in the grid and click &#8216;Select&#8217;.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.overseer-network-monitor.com/weblog/2012/04/03/overseer-resource-dependencies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Overseer 4.1.46 has been released</title>
		<link>http://www.overseer-network-monitor.com/weblog/2012/03/27/overseer-4-1-46-has-been-released/</link>
		<comments>http://www.overseer-network-monitor.com/weblog/2012/03/27/overseer-4-1-46-has-been-released/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 21:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dkalweit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Known Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Releases]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overseer-network-monitor.com/weblog/?p=355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The newest version of Overseer Network Monitor, 4.1.46 has been released. This minor build simply fixes the license key issue in 4.1.42.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The newest version of Overseer Network Monitor, 4.1.46 has been released. This minor build simply fixes the license key issue in 4.1.42.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.overseer-network-monitor.com/weblog/2012/03/27/overseer-4-1-46-has-been-released/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to prevent &#8216;false&#8217; notifications</title>
		<link>http://www.overseer-network-monitor.com/weblog/2012/03/15/how-to-prevent-false-notifications/</link>
		<comments>http://www.overseer-network-monitor.com/weblog/2012/03/15/how-to-prevent-false-notifications/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 13:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dkalweit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[How To]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips and Tricks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Using the Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Monitoring]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overseer-network-monitor.com/weblog/?p=348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sometimes Overseer customers will Email me and tell me that Overseer notifies them that their server is down, yet they login and everything is fine. This is something that will occur from time to time&#8211; Overseer detects a failure, but this may be caused by a network hiccup(particularly over WAN connections), or occasionally an OS issue. The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes Overseer customers will Email me and tell me that Overseer notifies them that their server is down, yet they login and everything is fine. This is something that will occur from time to time&#8211; Overseer detects a failure, but this may be caused by a network hiccup(particularly over WAN connections), or occasionally an OS issue. The first thing to do, is obviously investigate by looking at event logs, do some basic network tests(ping [host] -t to look for packet loss), etc.</p>
<p>However, even if something is found, it&#8217;s possible that there&#8217;s nothing you can do about it right away&#8211; but you really don&#8217;t want to be bothered by Overseer. Thankfully, there&#8217;s a feature in Overseer created just for this purpose.  Simply edit the schedule for the resources in question and edit the &#8216;After resource has been down&#8217; setting, as shown in this image:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.overseer-network-monitor.com/weblog/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Edit-Schedule-0021.png"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-351" title="Edit Schedule - After resource has been down" src="http://www.overseer-network-monitor.com/weblog/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Edit-Schedule-0021-300x290.png" alt="Edit Schedule - After resource has been down" width="300" height="290" /></a></p>
<p>Now, Overseer will wait 15 minutes before sending the first notification. So, when Overseer is checking resources using this schedule, if it fails it will see it&#8217;s been down 0 minutes, and wait. 5 minutes later, it will check again&#8211; if it&#8217;s still down, it will be down 5 minutes&#8211; which is also less than 15. It will wait until it hits that 15 minute mark(as configured above), and once it does, it will notify the administrators.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.overseer-network-monitor.com/weblog/2012/03/15/how-to-prevent-false-notifications/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Known issue: Licensing information &#8216;lost&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.overseer-network-monitor.com/weblog/2012/01/06/known-issue-licensing-information-lost/</link>
		<comments>http://www.overseer-network-monitor.com/weblog/2012/01/06/known-issue-licensing-information-lost/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 19:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dkalweit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Known Issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overseer-network-monitor.com/weblog/?p=342</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It has recently come to our attention that customers upgrading from previous versions of 4.1 to 4.1.41 or higher are experiencing issues with their licensing information(registered name and license key) &#8216;disappearing&#8217;. We have tracked this down to a change that has caused Overseer to look at a slightly different registry key(where this information is stored). [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has recently come to our attention that customers upgrading from previous versions of 4.1 to 4.1.41 or higher are experiencing issues with their licensing information(registered name and license key) &#8216;disappearing&#8217;. We have tracked this down to a change that has caused Overseer to look at a slightly different registry key(where this information is stored). If you require your licensing information, please contact us and include information regarding your company/registered username so we can find it in our system. Alternatively, you can use RegEdit and browse to HKLM\SOFTWARE\Sensible Software\Overseer\ and look at the &#8216;RegisteredUser&#8217; and &#8216;LicenseKey&#8217; fields and copy/paste these into the &#8216;Enter License&#8217; form under the Help menu in Overseer.  We&#8217;re sorry for the inconvenience this may have caused anyone.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>NOTE: This has been fixed in 4.1.46.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.overseer-network-monitor.com/weblog/2012/01/06/known-issue-licensing-information-lost/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Windows XP error: Logon failure: unknown user name or bad password</title>
		<link>http://www.overseer-network-monitor.com/weblog/2011/11/10/windows-xp-error-logon-failure-unknown-user-name-or-bad-password/</link>
		<comments>http://www.overseer-network-monitor.com/weblog/2011/11/10/windows-xp-error-logon-failure-unknown-user-name-or-bad-password/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 19:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dkalweit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tips and Tricks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overseer-network-monitor.com/weblog/?p=339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Occasionally with Overseer, a Windows XP system is configured in such a way that accessing it with valid login credentials will throw the error &#8220;Logon failure: unknown user name or bad password&#8221;. This is particularly frustrating when you KNOW it&#8217;s the correct user and password, and sometimes it&#8217;s even a local account&#8211; which is particularly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Occasionally with Overseer, a Windows XP system is configured in such a way that accessing it with valid login credentials will throw the error &#8220;Logon failure: unknown user name or bad password&#8221;. This is particularly frustrating when you KNOW it&#8217;s the correct user and password, and sometimes it&#8217;s even a local account&#8211; which is particularly confusing, as local accounts always &#8216;just work&#8217;&#8230;</p>
<p>The problem here, is a security policy that is sometimes on for Windows XP which causes this problem. It&#8217;s called &#8220;Network access: Sharing and security model for local accounts&#8221;, and is sometimes set to &#8220;Guest only &#8211; local user authenticate as Guest&#8221;. The proper setting is &#8220;Classic &#8211; local users authenticate as themselves&#8221;.</p>
<p>Thankfully, this can easily be changed using these steps:</p>
<ol>
<li>Start-&gt;Run and type &#8216;secpol.msc&#8217; and click OK</li>
<li>Navigate to Local Policies-&gt;Security Settings</li>
<li>Find &#8216;Network access: Sharing and security model for local accounts&#8217; on the right, and double-click it</li>
<li>Change the value to &#8216;Classic &#8211; local users authenticate as themselves&#8217;</li>
<li>Reboot</li>
</ol>
<div>You&#8217;ll now see things work as expected, for Overseer and any other connections.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.overseer-network-monitor.com/weblog/2011/11/10/windows-xp-error-logon-failure-unknown-user-name-or-bad-password/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Overseer 4.1.42 has been released</title>
		<link>http://www.overseer-network-monitor.com/weblog/2011/10/05/overseer-4-1-42-has-been-released/</link>
		<comments>http://www.overseer-network-monitor.com/weblog/2011/10/05/overseer-4-1-42-has-been-released/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 18:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dkalweit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[New Releases]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overseer-network-monitor.com/weblog/?p=334</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have just released Overseer 4.1.42. This is a small release that fixes a bug that I was just made aware of. The bug involved a red X on the resource selection screen in the Resource Discovery Wizard. Oddly enough, this bug was created when I upgraded the GUI library I use for Overseer, DevExpress. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have just released Overseer 4.1.42. This is a small release that fixes a bug that I was just made aware of. The bug involved a red X on the resource selection screen in the Resource Discovery Wizard. Oddly enough, this bug was created when I upgraded the GUI library I use for Overseer, DevExpress. When I did that, I changed the &#8216;default skin&#8217; to the more updated &#8216;Office 2010 Blue&#8217; from the &#8216;Office 2007 Blue&#8217; that&#8217;s been the default for years&#8230; Apparently that caused a &#8216;custom draw&#8217; event handler to throw an error&#8230; This is unfortunate, and a clear sign of the danger in upgrading a library&#8211; or a default skin(at least with DevExpress)&#8230; Unfortunately, this bug existed in Overseer for many months before someone finally reported it&#8211; it certainly doesn&#8217;t look good for me, and is another reminder to test every single part of the software, even if a change makes no sense that it would effect that part of the software&#8230;  If you see a bug in Overseer, even if it seems minor, please contact me at the support link above so I can fix it!</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.overseer-network-monitor.com/weblog/2011/10/05/overseer-4-1-42-has-been-released/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to compact an Overseer 4.1 database</title>
		<link>http://www.overseer-network-monitor.com/weblog/2011/09/23/how-to-compact-an-overseer-4-1-database/</link>
		<comments>http://www.overseer-network-monitor.com/weblog/2011/09/23/how-to-compact-an-overseer-4-1-database/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 13:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dkalweit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[How To]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips and Tricks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overseer-network-monitor.com/weblog/?p=330</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Overseer generally maintains its own database and doesn&#8217;t bloat significantly larger than it needs to be to hold your data. However, in some limited situations, it may be beneficial to compact the database if it gets quite large for some reason. This function should be built into Overseer at a future time, but for now [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Overseer generally maintains its own database and doesn&#8217;t bloat significantly larger than it needs to be to hold your data. However, in some limited situations, it may be beneficial to compact the database if it gets quite large for some reason. This function should be built into Overseer at a future time, but for now it can be done with this manual process:</p>
<ol>
<li>Download the Windows command line shell tool from <a href="http://www.sqlite.org/download.html">http://www.sqlite.org/download.html</a>  (currently labeled &#8216;sqlite-shell-win32-x86-3070800.zip&#8217;, but that will change as new versions are released)</li>
<li>Extract the contents of the above zip file to your c:\Program Files\Overseer 4\Data\ directory(assuming default paths)</li>
<li>Make sure Overseer is closed</li>
<li>Launch a command shell by going to Start-&gt;Run and typing &#8216;cmd&#8217; and pressing enter.</li>
<li>Type the following commands:
<pre>cd "\program files\overseer 4\data"</pre>
<pre>net stop overseersvc</pre>
<pre>sqlite3 overseer4config.db vacuum</pre>
<pre>sqlite3 overseer4data.db vacuum</pre>
</li>
<li>Now, you can close the command window and re-start Overseer, which will automatically prompt to restart the service.</li>
</ol>
<p>If you have any questions or anything doesn&#8217;t go as described here, please contact support using the support link above.</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.overseer-network-monitor.com/weblog/2011/09/23/how-to-compact-an-overseer-4-1-database/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Overseer 4.1.41 has been released</title>
		<link>http://www.overseer-network-monitor.com/weblog/2011/08/17/overseer-4-1-41-has-been-released/</link>
		<comments>http://www.overseer-network-monitor.com/weblog/2011/08/17/overseer-4-1-41-has-been-released/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 18:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dkalweit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[New Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News about Overseer Network Monitor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overseer-network-monitor.com/weblog/?p=327</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Overseer 4.1.41 has been released. This is primarily for a bug fix that only affects those using EM1 environmental monitors, and monitoring relative humidity with that monitor. As a side note, I plan on adding support for an inexpensive USB temperature monitoring device soon. These devices will be available for sale on our website at [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Overseer 4.1.41 has been released. This is primarily for a bug fix that only affects those using EM1 environmental monitors, and monitoring relative humidity with that monitor.</p>
<p>As a side note, I plan on adding support for an inexpensive USB temperature monitoring device soon. These devices will be available for sale on our website at a fraction of the cost of an EM1 unit(probably less than the EM1 probe itself!). The limitation, is that it will have to be physically connected to a computer&#8211; but most customers of <a href="http://www.overseer-network-monitor.com/">Overseer Network Monitor</a> have a computer close enough to what they&#8217;d like to monitor that this isn&#8217;t a big deal. Stay tuned for more information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.overseer-network-monitor.com/weblog/2011/08/17/overseer-4-1-41-has-been-released/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Referring to computers by multiple names can cause issues</title>
		<link>http://www.overseer-network-monitor.com/weblog/2011/08/09/referring-to-computers-by-multiple-names-can-cause-issues/</link>
		<comments>http://www.overseer-network-monitor.com/weblog/2011/08/09/referring-to-computers-by-multiple-names-can-cause-issues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 13:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dkalweit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tips and Tricks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Using the Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overseer-network-monitor.com/weblog/?p=324</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Overseer Network Monitor is designed to monitor multiple resources on multiple computers from one location. To do this, the user must enter in the appropriate credentials for these computers(usually the domain administrator account). When Overseer checks the resources, it impersonates this user so it has adequate privileges to perform this monitoring. This generally works quite well, but [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Overseer Network Monitor is designed to monitor multiple resources on multiple computers from one location. To do this, the user must enter in the appropriate credentials for these computers(usually the domain administrator account). When Overseer checks the resources, it impersonates this user so it has adequate privileges to perform this monitoring.</p>
<p>This generally works quite well, but there is a catch. For added performance, Overseer is able to monitor multiple resources at the same time. This can cause a problem if those resources are on the same physical computer, as the Windows authentication system only supports one login/impersonation from one computer at a time.  Overseer handles this by limiting resource checking for a specific computer to one at a time(it can still monitor multiple resources simultaneously, but they must be on separate computers&#8211; those on the same computer have to wait in line for the other resources to be checked).</p>
<p>This also works quite well, and is entirely transparent to end-users of Overseer Network Monitor. The one gotcha can come in when the user refers to a computer in multiple different ways&#8230; For example, they may have a disk space resource setup as \\server1\c$, but they have a service being monitored on &#8217;10.0.0.101&#8242;&#8230; If 10.0.0.101 and &#8216;server1&#8242; are the same computer, Overseer does not know this, and the problem above can occur. This often presents itself as false reports of problems, and often times Overseer is unable to successfully test a resource on that computer until the Overseer service is restarted.</p>
<p>In the future, I may add a function to Overseer to attempt to resolve a computer&#8217;s name to an IP, and identify it that way to prevent this problem&#8211; but that, too, won&#8217;t be 100% in the case of some multi-homed machines.  For now, Overseer users will have to be aware that it&#8217;s best practice to use the same name when referring to the computer throughout Overseer&#8211; use either &#8216;server1&#8242; or &#8217;10.0.0.101&#8242;&#8211; but never one for one resource, and one for another resource.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.overseer-network-monitor.com/weblog/2011/08/09/referring-to-computers-by-multiple-names-can-cause-issues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

